Nick Leeson, the original Rogue Trader and the man we all wanted to interview yesterday, popped up on Irish radio station RTE Thursday night offering his insight into the state of mind of 31-year-old Jerome Kerviel, dubbed by French daily le Parisien “the man who blew up the bank”. (Ah, if he’d been American, we ALL know what daredevil name the press would have given him…)
“I would imagine as well that yesterday morning there would have been a perverse sense of relief, because he has not been able to bring it to an end himself,” Leeson said.
Beyond that, it’s difficult to get straight answers from anybody over here — the most honest (and anonymous) offered so far being, “There but for the grace of God…”
Soc Gen co-chief executive Philippe Citerne told the Wall Street Journal
that Kerviel learned how to circumvent risk controls by working in the back office, and that red flags went up after he “changed his tactics” and triggered a margin call.
So, what had he been doing? Offsetting his positions against naked shorts from another account, creating the impression of a hedge? That would require changing ownership of funds, which is theoretically impossible… And what did he have to gain? Was he planning to shift the winnings to another account and then disappear?
In the end, these questions may be better suited for psychologists than for risk managers — and risk managers may be well-advised to consult psychologists when devising their foolproof plans.