Archive for the ‘Buy outs’ Category

Corzine: too big to succeed on smaller scale

Monday, October 31st, 2011

There was a rumor going around — later confirmed by multiple sources — that during Jon Corzine’s initial conversation with MF Global’s vast network of brokers shortly after he took the helm of the large futures broker, he became perplexed with numerous references to MF Global’s IBs.

At one point he stopped and asked why all these references to Investment Banking? The joke at the time was that Corzine came in with a lot of experience operating an investment bank but was a neophyte in the world of futures and didn’t know he was addressing MF’s vast network of introducing brokers.

(more…)

Will MF Global make the Monday open?

Monday, October 31st, 2011

I had a strange feeling of deja vu as I left work on Friday. MF Global had dropped precipitously after a poor second quarter earnings report came out on Tuesday and there were numerous reports that they were looking to sell. Then on Friday word came out that ratings agency Fitch had downgraded their debt to junk status.  (more…)

Equity index provider arbitrage

Monday, October 10th, 2011

When CME Group first announced that it would take a majority stake in Dow Jones Indexes a year ago my first thought was to ask if there would be any antitrust issues as CME Group has exclusive licenses with Standard & poor’s (a competitor to Dow Jones Indexes) to list futures products on its S&P 500 index as well as others. Neither Dow Jones Indexes nor CME Group seemed to worry it was an issue at the time.  (more…)

Dept. of Justice steps up

Wednesday, May 18th, 2011

When I first heard of the Nasdaq OMX/Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) counteroffer for the NYSE Euronext, which has a merger agreement in place with Deutsche Börse, my first thought was that it could not stand up to a Department of Justice review. You are talking about the two biggest stock markets in the United States that account for all or nearly all of new offerings.

I remember arguing with a colleague that merging the two largest U.S. stock exchanges would not be allowed. We talked about the Chicago Mercantile Exchange acquisition of the Chicago Board of Trade and how some folks thought it could be held up by antitrust concerns. I recall that the CME and CBOT’s argument was that they did not compete against each other directly as the CME’s main products were short-term interest rates, equity indexes and meats while the CBOT concentrated on long-term interest rates and grains. Obviously that is an argument that could not be made with a Nasdaq and NYSE hook-up.

(more…)

Merge this

Tuesday, February 15th, 2011

The recent merger announcements from  the London Stock Exchange and Toronto Exchange Group (TMX), and Deutsche Börse and NYSE Euronext brought a surge of speculation and potential merger stories to the forefront of business wires.

Who will merge next? Who will offer a competitive bid? I guess it is inevitable but there is something annoying about seeing the business press simply speculating on potential deals once these mergers get in the public consciousness.

(more…)

Another one bites the dust

Friday, May 22nd, 2009

PFGBEST announced yesterday that it is purchasing the customer assets of non-clearing futures commission merchant Alaron Trading Corporation.

 

This will further shrink the ranks of independent futures brokers, which had been thinning for several years due to industry consolidation.

(more…)

Who's next?

Wednesday, July 18th, 2007

Back in December I wrote a story about the four grain exchanges and the liquidity that was pouring into them as they went electronic on the Chicago Board of Trade’s e-CBOT trading platform and began offering side by side trading (see “Trade locally, think globally,” December 2006, page 52). The idea behind that story was that with exchange consolidation fever in the air, the regional grain exchanges just might be tasty targets for acquisition.

Since then, the CBOT merged with the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, and the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) made an offer for the Winnipeg Commodity Exchange (WCE); the latest news is that a competitive unsolicited bid of CAN $50 million, or $77.59 per share, has been made for the WCE by an unnamed third party. That exceeds the CAN $40 million, or $62.08 per share that ICE bid.

Two down and two to go. But what about the Minneapolis Grain Exchange (MGEX) and the Kansas City Board of Trade?

Since December, the price of a membership at the Minneapolis Grain Exchange has increased to $170,000 from $65,000, and the exchange, which owns its own clearing operation, trades hard red spring wheat and five financially settled index contracts, has logged record trading volumes in three of the last six months, both in pit trading and electronic trading. But the exchange is still a mutual organization, making it an unlikely target for acquisition due to the lack of common currency.

Meanwhile at the Kansas City Board of Trade (KCBT), the home of the hard red winter wheat contract, the last membership traded hands in April for $465,000, up from $300,000 in December. Jeffrey C. Borchardt, president of the KCBT, says that the exchange converted to a Delaware for-profit corporation in 1973, not for the purposes of merger and acquisition, he says, but to unlock the value for members in the form of dividends, which the company has paid for each of the last nine years.

So what’s keeping them from being assimilated?

“There is nothing keeping us from doing that. It’s all a matter of interest and strategy,” Borchardt says. “The trend will continue, and at some point in time we may have to consider whether that is in the best interest of our members and customers to get involved with something like that, either on the buying or the selling end.”

Now don’t get the wrong idea. Borchardt DID NOT cop to anything in the works. In fact he wouldn’t even deny that the KCBT hadn’t made the offer for the WCE, (how’s that for canny?) But with 50% increase in seat prices over the last seven months, wheat prices as high as they are, and the issue of e-CBOT going away in the next 12 to 18 months, nothing would surprise me.

Is CBOT in too much of a hurry?

Friday, June 15th, 2007

One financial investor in the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) is saying publicly in a letter to CBOT Chairman Charlie Carey and president and CEO Bernie Dan that the terms of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange’s (CME) offer to merge with the CBOT are not good enough.

“The CBOT is only merging with the CME because everyone else is merging and it does not want to get left out, and that in of itself, is not a good reason,” says Chris Doll, managing partner at The Vernalis Group LLC, the managing partner of Amphora Fund LLP, which has invested more than 18% of its portfolio in the CBOT.

“As a long-term oriented shareholder, we are very interested in the unlocked value that still exists at the [CBOT],” Doll says in his letter dated June 11. “If there is still potential for value creation as an independent entity, and if the financial markets have yet to fully value this potential, then why should shareholders vote ‘YES’ to merge with any partner at this time,” he asks?

Doll sees possibilities for the CBOT to increase their value at the bargaining table if only they wait a bit longer. It had been less than a year from when the CBOT went public to when it considered the merger with the CME and it did not allow itself enough time to grow. For example, the agricultural contracts just went electronic last August and while it has been a success it can become even more successful. Also the pricing increases stemming from the CBOT fighting off competition from Eurex US have not been allowed to take full effect.

He adds that he does want to see the CBOT merge with the CME, but only if the CME offers a deal that better reflects the future potential value of the CBOT.

View the letter

CME's Donahue stays confident of deal

Friday, June 1st, 2007

Friday morning, June 1, Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) Chief Executive Officer Craig Donohue spoke on a Deutsche Bank CEO conference call. He answered questions from reporters about the CME/Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) proposed merger, and it got interesting.

One reporter who called in told Donahue that while he kept saying the CME’s deal was superior to the InterContinental Exchange’s (ICE) deal and that the CME was a superior company to the ICE, that didn’t answer the question on most CBOT members’ minds, “Are you going to offer more money?” Because, the reporter continued, “many members think you’re low-balling them.”

Donahue responded, “These people are traders, and they are playing the game, but I’m confident there is tremendous support for the deal.”

The reporter also told Donohue that if the CBOT were to vote tomorrow, the votes would not go in favor of the CME deal.

“I don’t agree with that assessment,” Donohue replied.

It’s clear that nothing is clear. Will the CME up the offer? If they don’t, are there not enough of what Donohue calls a “vocal minority,” who oppose the deal to vote against it? As the voting day draws closer, Futures wants to know what you think, especially if you’re a CBOT member!
(by Yesenia Salcedo)

Open mike night at the ICE

Friday, June 1st, 2007

“Yesterday, if the Merc matches the [ICE] bid it is a no brainer, now the Merc has to pay a premium—this is a guy with vision.”

That is how one Chicago Board of Trade full member, who stuck around for four hours at the meeting between the InterContinental Exchange Chairman and CEO Jeff Sprecher and CBOT members to discuss the ICE offer for the CBOT, reacted to the meeting. That same member was upset with the Chicago Mercantile Exchange’s justification for its lower bid, noting that the synergies that make the deal more valuable to the CBOT also make it more valuable to the CME. “Why does the Board of Trade have to pay the discount? The entire burden is put on Board of Trade members.”

The 300 plus CBOT members who attended the meeting had varying opinions regarding the ICE offer and CBOT/CME agreement but all seemed to have gained a large measure of respect for Sprecher, a man many of them knew little about.

(more…)