<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Buy the Rumor Sell the Fact &#187; Barack Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buytherumorsellthefact.com/tag/barack-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buytherumorsellthefact.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 04:09:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Speculators: In vogue again</title>
		<link>http://www.buytherumorsellthefact.com/2009/07/08/speculators-in-vogue-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buytherumorsellthefact.com/2009/07/08/speculators-in-vogue-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christine Birkner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regulatory/actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CFTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Gensler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speculators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buytherumorsellthefact.com/?p=1751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a reporter covering the futures markets, it&#8217;s not often that the mainstream media has its eye on what&#8217;s going on in my world. But on my way past a newsstand this afternoon, I noticed that the front pages of both the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal (admittedly, not quite as mainstream) featured stories about the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a reporter covering the futures markets, it&#8217;s not often that the mainstream media has its eye on what&#8217;s going on in my world. But on my way past a newsstand this afternoon, I noticed that the front pages of both the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/08/business/08cftc.html?em" target="_blank">New York Times</a> and the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124700398437207969.html" target="_blank">Wall Street Journal</a> (admittedly, not quite as mainstream) featured stories about the thing that&#8217;s got traders buzzing again: Washington attacks on speculators. The speculation blame game is nothing new (in fact, this time last year several mainstream media outlets got into the act of covering it, including 60 Minutes, in an infamous and much-maligned-within-the-industry piece). Last summer there were hearings galore in the House and Senate blaming speculators for the rising price of oil, while the <a href="http://cftc.gov" target="_blank">Commodity Futures Trading Commission</a> (CFTC) said all evidence was to the contrary. But this time, it&#8217;s different.</p>
<p><span id="more-1751"></span></p>
<p>This time the attacks are actually coming from the CFTC, as new Chairman Gary Gensler <a href="http://www.cftc.gov/stellent/groups/public/@newsroom/documents/pressrelease/genslerstatement070709.pdf" target="_blank">announced</a> that the agency would consider imposing position limits in the energy markets. It&#8217;s part of a <a href="http://buytherumorsellthefact.com/2009/06/18/a-new-ball-game-for-regs/" target="_blank">larger regultory overhaul</a> by the Obama Administration that has <a href="http://buytherumorsellthefact.com/2009/06/19/cftcsec-may-not-play-well-together/" target="_blank">heated up</a> over the past few months and includes the <a href="http://www.financialstability.gov/docs/regs/FinalReport_web.pdf" target="_blank">proposal for regulatory reform</a> released in mid-June. It&#8217;ll be interesting to see how this latest round of regulatory wrangling is covered by the mainstream media, and how it shakes up the futures industry. We&#8217;ll have the latest reaction to recent regulatory developments in the August issue of <a href="http://www.futuresmag.com" target="_blank">Futures magazine</a>, online July 23.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buytherumorsellthefact.com/2009/07/08/speculators-in-vogue-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposal packs punch</title>
		<link>http://www.buytherumorsellthefact.com/2009/06/18/proposal-packs-punch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buytherumorsellthefact.com/2009/06/18/proposal-packs-punch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christine Birkner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regulatory/actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Brodsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CFTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CME Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit default swaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Damgard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Pickel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury Department]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buytherumorsellthefact.com/?p=1709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Industry leaders wasted no time commenting on the Obama Administration&#8217;s new regulatory reform proposal, &#8220;Financial Regulatory Reform: A New Foundation,&#8221; released yesterday. The proposal received mostly a chorus of praise from the industry. CME Group called it &#8220;a significant step towards restoring confidence in the integrity of financial markets.&#8221; International Swaps and Derivatives Association CEO Robert Pickel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Industry leaders wasted no time commenting on the Obama Administration&#8217;s new regulatory reform proposal, &#8220;<a href="http://www.financialstability.gov/docs/regs/FinalReport_web.pdf" target="_blank">Financial Regulatory Reform: A New Foundation</a>,&#8221; released <a href="http://futuresmag.com/cms/futures/Breaking%20News/2009/06/17-Jun07" target="_blank">yesterday</a>.</p>
<p>The proposal received mostly a chorus of praise from the industry. <a href="http://www.cmegroup.com/" target="_blank">CME Group</a> <a href="http://http://cmegroup.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&amp;item=2872&amp;pagetemplate=article" target="_blank">called it</a> &#8220;a significant step towards restoring confidence in the integrity of financial markets.&#8221; International Swaps and Derivatives Association CEO Robert Pickel said <a href="http://isda.org/" target="_blank">in a statement</a> that it &#8220;provide[s] an important framework for financial regulatory reform.&#8221; In <a href="http://http://www.futuresindustry.org/press-center.asp" target="_blank">his statement</a>, <a href="http://www.futuresindustry.org/" target="_blank">Futures Industry Association</a>President John Damgard &#8220;commend[ed] the administration for the thoughtfulness and comprehensiveness of its plan.&#8221; In a statement, <a href="http://www.cboe.com" target="_blank">Chicago Board Options Exchange Chairman</a>Bill Brodsky said, “We are particularly pleased that the plan recognizes the need for greater coordination and harmonization of the SEC and CFTC,  including streamlining the approval of new products and rule filings.&#8221; But not everyone is singing the proposal&#8217;s praises.<span id="more-1709"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;font-family: Verdana">The &#8220;harmonization&#8221; of regulatory agencies is one of the elements that could impact the futures industry the most. Specifically, the plan calls for the <a href="http://cftc.gov" target="_blank">CFTC</a> and <a href="http://www.sec.gov" target="_blank">SEC</a>to make recommendations to Congress on how to eliminate differences &#8220;with respect to similar types of financial instruments that are not essential to achieving investor protection.&#8221; The two agencies must complete a report with recommendations by Sept. 30. If they don&#8217;t the matter will be forwarded to the soon-to-be created Financial Services Oversight Council. Some are concerned that the creation of additional agencies will not solve the regulatory problems that exist in the financial system. &#8220;In the proposal, there are not one, not two, but three proposed coordinating committees [including] the Financial Services Oversight Council. The better solution would have been to get rid of all of those agencies that require coordiation and consolidate them somehow,&#8221; says Gary DeWaal, general counsel of Newedge. &#8220;It&#8217;s more of the same. The Obama Administration has other priorities and they don&#8217;t want to use political capital to make real effective change in the financial services industry,&#8221; he adds. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;font-family: Verdana"><a href="http://agriculture.house.gov/index.shtml" target="_blank">House Agriculture Committee</a> Chairman Collin Peterson isn&#8217;t a huge fan of the proposal either. In a <a href="http://agriculture.house.gov/list/press/agriculture_dem/st_reg_reform.html" target="_blank">statement</a>, Peterson said he was &#8220;concerned about proposals to expand the authority and responsibility of the Federal Reserve, a secretive and unaccountable institution.&#8221; </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;font-family: Verdana">Peterson did, however, applaud the proposal&#8217;s </span><span style="font-size: 10pt;font-family: Verdana">reforms for over the counter (OTC) derivatives regulation, including credit default swaps, the proposal&#8217;s other big takeaway impacting the futures industry. The proposal requires standardized OTC derivatives to be centrally cleared and executed on exchanges and requires transparency for all OTC trades and positions through recordkeeping and reporting requirements, as called for by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner in an <a href="http://buytherumorsellthefact.com/2009/05/15/regulatory-rumblings/#more-1680" target="_blank">earlier</a> <a href="http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/tg129.htm">OTC reform proposal</a>.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buytherumorsellthefact.com/2009/06/18/proposal-packs-punch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Worst inauguration day for Dow</title>
		<link>http://www.buytherumorsellthefact.com/2009/01/20/worst-inauguration-day-for-dow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buytherumorsellthefact.com/2009/01/20/worst-inauguration-day-for-dow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christine Birkner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CFTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DJIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Gensler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Dunn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buytherumorsellthefact.com/?p=1284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today was the worst inauguration day performance in the Dow Jones Industrial Average&#8217;s history, according to Dow Jones. The Dow closed below 8,000 for the first time since Nov. 20 and had its largest daily point and percent drop since Dec. 1. President Barack Obama in his inaugural address today spoke of the economic dilemmas he&#8217;s inheriting. Here are some highlights: &#8220;The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today was the worst inauguration day performance in the <a href="http://www.djindexes.com/mdsidx/index.cfm?event=showAverages" target="_blank">Dow Jones Industrial Average&#8217;s</a> history, according to Dow Jones. The Dow closed below 8,000 for the first time since Nov. 20 and had its largest daily point and percent drop since Dec. 1.</p>
<p>President Barack Obama in his <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/20/us/politics/20text-obama.html?pagewanted=1" target="_blank">inaugural address</a> today spoke of the economic dilemmas he&#8217;s inheriting. Here are some highlights:</p>
<p><span id="more-1284"></span>&#8220;The state of our economy calls for action: bold and swift.&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8220;This crisis has reminded us that without a watchful eye, the market can spin out of control. The nation cannot prosper long when it favors only the prosperous.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Our economy is badly weakened, a consequence of <a href="http://futuresmag.com/cms/futures/monthly%20issues/Issues/2009/01/Editorial/Editors%20Note/EditorsNote" target="_blank">greed and irresponsibility</a> on the part of some but also our collective failure to make hard choices and prepare the nation for a new age.&#8221;</p>
<p>The swearing in of Obama also comes with leadership change at the <a href="http://cftc.gov/" target="_blank">Commodity Futures Trading Commission</a> (CFTC). Commissioner Michael Dunn <a href="http://cftc.gov/newsroom/generalpressreleases/2009/pr5602-09.html" target="_blank">was named acting chairman</a> until Obama&#8217;s choice for CFTC chair, Gary Gensler, is confirmed by the Senate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buytherumorsellthefact.com/2009/01/20/worst-inauguration-day-for-dow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

