Posts Tagged ‘futures exchanges’

Nymex to move?

Monday, August 13th, 2007

The rumor is not only is the New York Mercantile Exchange (Nymex) looking to sell its building, but it could move to the New York Stock Exchange, which is already rearranging its floor for the new tenant. The NYSE in the run for Nymex is a bit of an oddity, with the most likely player for Nymex’s affection being the Chicago Mercantile Exchange or CME Group. Last November, prior to the InterContinental Exchange’s failed run at the Chicago Board of Trade, a CME official noted with confidence that Nymex would be the next target after the CBOT purchase was finished. Seems some at Nymex are hoping for it, especially floor traders who are said to be having a morale issue. Whatever happens it probably will be soon as Nymex is on a trajectory to sell its building and put itself on the block. With Nymex products trading on Globex already, CME Group seems the right fit, while Nyse/Euronext might be better off going after ICE.

Dueling spin

Monday, August 6th, 2007

One of the things I liked about working on the trading floor was no matter how bad of a day you were having, when the bell rang the day was over and after checking fills you could go home. Electronic trading and for-profit exchanges have changed all that, even the exchanges’ communications staff are working overtime.

An example of this is the two press releases we received over the weekend with varying interpretations of a Friday decision by the Delaware Chancery Court.

Both the Chicago Board Options Exchange and CME Group claimed victory in the battle over Chicago Board of Trade exercise right privileges (ERPs) after the court made its ruling. The court ruled in favor of CBOE, rejecting a motion by two CBOT members asking for a temporary restraining order to prevent CBOE from enforcing rules restricting leasing privileges of CBOT members. The court also granted a CBOE request to suspend proceedings until the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) takes action on the CBOE rule changes that claim the CME/CBOT merger extinguishes the CBOT member ERPs.

While apparent victories for CBOE, the court also offered an opinion on its authority to rule on the CBOT complaint regarding the exercise right. The opinion states, “Despite the CBOE’s urgings to the contrary, the Court retains jurisdiction to determine whether the Defendants’ actions have the operative effect of divesting the Plaintiff-class of a vested economic and property interest.”

So there will be no restraining order and the Delaware Court will wait on an SEC decision before taking up the case. As far as the spin coming from each exchange, we won’t attempt to offer a legal opinion. The market however appears to be siding with the CBOE interpretation as a CBOE seat traded today for a record $2.7 million.

Trading floors on the way out, really

Thursday, August 2nd, 2007

At least that’s what it seems like in New York, where Nymex Holdings, the parent of the New York Mercantile Exchange (Nymex), is slashing costs through the next three months, specifically targeting the population of its trading floor, which has seen volume dwindle as more contracts are traded through an electronic alliance with the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME).

Floor trading volume dropped by half in the second quarter of 2007 compared with last year, when Nymex agreed to start trading its contracts on the CME’s Globex electronic system. Energy futures and options volume averaged 257,000 contracts on the Nymex in the second quarter, compared with 537,000 in the same period last year. Meanwhile, electronic trading volume soared more than 400%.

Nymex Chairman Richard Schaeffer indicated in a conference call this week that changes involving the trading floor may be coming sooner rather than later. A Forbes story quotes Schaeffer as saying, “These [changes] aren’t things that are going to be put off for six months.”

(more…)

Something has got to give

Wednesday, July 25th, 2007

There is a strange anomaly going on with the dance between the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Chicago Board of Trade members and the newly formed CME Group.

Theoretically the closing of the merger between the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and CBOT should have negatively affected the value of CBOE seats but CBOE announced a record seat sale of $2.65 million yesterday. After all the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) had worked a deal with the CBOE that if approved by CBOT members would have put a definitive price on the value of exercise right privileges (ERP) on CBOE held by CBOT members. In outbidding the ICE, the CME took off the cap on funds it would dedicate to defend those rights. Additionally CME Group pledged yesterday to “vigorously defend the right of CBOT B-1 members in the Delaware litigation against CBOE.”

The CME Group release goes on to say, “We will continue to work to preserve the rights of CBOT members to become or remain exerciser members of the CBOE pursuant to the exercise right and to share equally in any CBOE demutualization (ital. mine).”

The term “equally” is an important one. There are 1,331 ERPs out there and approximately 827 CBOT members holding all of the necessary components to use the right. But we are not talking about using the right, we are talking about equity in a demutualized CBOE. A CME Group spokesperson says only those members with all the necessary components would be eligible to retain the right pursuant to the Delaware court action and qualify for equity in a CBOE demutualization but that a record date would be set in the future and members would be able to reassemble components to qualify for a stake. There are 930 CBOE members, if an additional 827 ERP holders (and possibly many more) qualify for a full share stake in a CBOE demutualization, current CBOE members would see their share stake cut by nearly half, or more.

To give a little perspective, the first CBOE seat sale in 2007 was for $1.8 million and a seat went for a low of $850,000 as recently as January 2006.

So why did a CBOE seat sell for a record $2.65 million? With seat prices continually rising throughout the ICE/CBOE negotiations, there probably is a CBOT member equity stake in CBOE worked into the price of CBOE memberships. But if that is the case that price is probably the equivalent to the CBOE offer, which was roughly 10% of a CBOE full member not including the ICE share. A source with an interest in the value of both CBOE and CBOT told Futures prior to the CME/CBOT merger vote that the street was valuing the ERP at 20-25% of a CBOE membership. The assumes that ERP holders would eventually be awarded equity in CBOE equivalent to 20-25% of what a full CBOE member gets. If somewhere between 827 to 1,331 ERP holders are awarded a 100% share of what the 930 CBOE members will receive, that would make the most reason sale a pretty bad investment. However, the market is usually right and if the CBOE wins the court battle and the rights are extinguished completely, that $2.65 million price tag will be the bargain of the century.

CBOT fills CME

Thursday, July 12th, 2007

Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) shares rallied to $172.45 today, making the value of its offer for the Chicago Board of Trade $12.9 billion. Based on the most recent share price of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange

Oh forget it!

Since ICE made its competing bid for the CBOT, chart watching has become a mild obsession and now that the CBOT and CME shareholders have approved their definitive merger agreement, I find myself in need of a fix. I am sure there will soon be new merger and acquisition proposals to follow as the New York Mercantile Exchange may be looking for a partner, ICE becomes a target and U.S. based options exchanges may begin to find partners.

(more…)

ICE draws line in sand, CME spits

Tuesday, July 3rd, 2007

After large stock holders of the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) weighed in with their opinions the last month, it seems the vote for or against a “merger” with the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) is coming down to the wire, just like a good old fashion Chicago election. A couple weeks ago, while one of the largest shareholders of CBOT stock, Caledonia Investment Pty. Ltd. of Australia, publicly stated it voted against the merger, another investor, Vernalis Group, whose funds have over $7.5 million of CBOT shares, urged the CBOT board not to make any decision on a merger now. “You should feel no sense of urgency to complete a deal right now. The pressure to merge with BOT should be with CME and ICE management alone. We should be patient and allow time for our full, true value to surface,” said Vernalis Group Managing Partner Chris Doll in a letter to CBOT Chairman Charlie Carey on June 11. Then came an announcement that the Instituional Shareholder Services (which isn’t a shareholder) recommended for the merger with the CME. It’s no wonder why CBOT members still are unsure how to vote and the decision, to come July 9, is up in the air.

Then on July 3, only days after the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) sponsored a swanky cocktail party at Grant Park in Chicago held for CBOT members to urge them to vote no to the CME proposal, ICE gave members until 5 p.m. on July 12 to vote for its current proposal. This would be only days after the July 9 CME vote, if indeed it’s voted down. The CME, which held its own member cocktail party, countered with blunt language: “ICE continues to try to play the role of a spoiler in the CME CBOT merger agreement and has offered nothing new to its proposal. Having been rejected by CBOT’s board not once but twice, ICE has yet to address the fundamental strategic and operationa flaws in its proposed transaction….”

Most likely the back and forth is falling on deaf ears. Chances are most CBOT members have left town for the July 4th holiday, hoping to watch fireworks from a lawn chair with a brew in one hand and a hot dog in the other. July 9th will come soon enough, and right now, CME is seen as the winner by a squeaker. Despite his higher bid, ICE CEO Jeff Sprecher may learn the hard way that he may be from the Midwest, but he’s not from Chicago.

Down to the wire?

Monday, June 25th, 2007

As I opened up my Chicago Sun Times today I noticed the full page ad by the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) exclaiming to Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) members, “DON’T BE SOLD SHORT.”

The ad in the sports section opposite the Chicago Cubs and White Sox box score, listed reasons why the ICE proposal to the CBOT was superior to the definitive agreement the CBOT’s board of directors reached with the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME). At the top of list was the $22.72 per share premium in the ICE offer as of Friday’s close. That premium grew to $26.14 after Monday’s close though it doesn’t include the $9.14 per share dividend to be paid to CBOT members as part of the CME’s most recent enhanced offer (though it is technically being paid by the CBOT). It goes on to tout the agreement reached with the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) over the Exercise Right Privilege (ERP), ICE’s fast growing stock and ICE’s ability to scale its technology to meet the needs of CBOT customers.

Not to be outdone the CME placed its own ad urging CBOT members to vote “YES” for the merger at the July 9 meeting. The CME cites the long-term potential, growth opportunities and a greater ability to integrate the CBOT and CME among other reason to go with the CME.

Later in the afternoon the CME put out a press release citing several analysts who have pointed out that ICE’s stock has had a tendency to improve when it seemed less likely they would win the battle for the CBOT. The implication being that ICE stock would drop precipitously if and when an ICE/CBOT deal is struck.

It is an interesting tactic because CME confirmed Monday was most likely the last day they could improve their offer to the CBOT without delaying the July 9 vote. As of the close of business there was no enhanced CME offer so it appears the two exchanges are prepared to go into the vote with their current offers.

This obviously can change as the vote has been delayed before.

Insurgent commodity exchange's guerilla tactics

Friday, June 22nd, 2007

This morning on my way into the office, I had an opportunity to speak with a woman passing out T-shirts and press releases across the street from the Chicago Board of Trade.

This isn’t the least bit unusual. What surprised me is that she wasn’t passing out Chicago Mercantile Exchange T-shirts, or ‘Better Together’ badges or stickers.

She was working for the Intercontinental Exchange, and she wasn’t hyping their agreement to buy the Winnipeg Commodities Exchange either. She was there doing grass roots, guerilla marketing for the ICE, urging passers by to vote ‘no’ on the CME proposal to acquire the CBOT, which is scheduled for July 9.

While the ICE hasn’t taken the Merc’s lunch money yet, by taking the Russell 2000 contract and now the WCE, Jeff Sprecher has taken two bites from Terry Duffy’s sandwich; and with just more than two weeks to go before the vote, I am eagerly watching to see what he will do about it.

Now it is getting interesting

Wednesday, June 20th, 2007

The battle between the Intercontinental Exchange and Chicago Mercantile Exchange over the Chicago Board of Trade took an interesting twist on Monday when ICE inked an exclusive agreement with Russell Investment Group parent of the Russell family of indexes.

The decision reverses Russell’s strategy of licensing its indexes to multiple exchanges and letting them fight over liquidity. Kelly Haughton, strategic director for Russell Indexes, says he believes this is a better way to go.

(more…)

Is CBOT in too much of a hurry?

Friday, June 15th, 2007

One financial investor in the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) is saying publicly in a letter to CBOT Chairman Charlie Carey and president and CEO Bernie Dan that the terms of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange’s (CME) offer to merge with the CBOT are not good enough.

“The CBOT is only merging with the CME because everyone else is merging and it does not want to get left out, and that in of itself, is not a good reason,” says Chris Doll, managing partner at The Vernalis Group LLC, the managing partner of Amphora Fund LLP, which has invested more than 18% of its portfolio in the CBOT.

“As a long-term oriented shareholder, we are very interested in the unlocked value that still exists at the [CBOT],” Doll says in his letter dated June 11. “If there is still potential for value creation as an independent entity, and if the financial markets have yet to fully value this potential, then why should shareholders vote ‘YES’ to merge with any partner at this time,” he asks?

Doll sees possibilities for the CBOT to increase their value at the bargaining table if only they wait a bit longer. It had been less than a year from when the CBOT went public to when it considered the merger with the CME and it did not allow itself enough time to grow. For example, the agricultural contracts just went electronic last August and while it has been a success it can become even more successful. Also the pricing increases stemming from the CBOT fighting off competition from Eurex US have not been allowed to take full effect.

He adds that he does want to see the CBOT merge with the CME, but only if the CME offers a deal that better reflects the future potential value of the CBOT.

View the letter