Posts Tagged ‘law suits’

Two’s company, three's a crowd and four is a mess

Thursday, May 31st, 2007

The latest twist in the battle for the Chicago Board of Trade occurred Wednesday morning as the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) and Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) announced that the two have entered an exclusive agreement regarding CBOE Exercise Rights as part of ICE’s proposed merger with the CBOT.

As part of the agreement, full CBOT members holding CBOE exercise rights would receive $500,000 in value for each right. The $500,000 payout will be split between the ICE and CBOE. Each exchange will offer $250,000 in cash to CBOT members holding rights or debt securities convertible into stock. On the ICE side that would be stock in the newly combined CBOT/ICE and on the CBOE side, common shares of CBOE after a demutualization. The agreement is contingent on the completion of a merger between the CBOT and ICE.

The package is worth up to $665.5 million, which is equal to the outstanding 1,331 exercise rights times $500,000. Only those CBOT full members eligible to use their exercise right qualify for the consideration. That means they must hold their Class B-1 membership, the exercise right privilege (ERP) and 27,338 Class A common shares. Those that hold the first two and have sold off stock can qualify if they purchase enough stock to bring them back up to the 27,338 threshold by a certain date.

After the most recent compromise between the CBOT and CBOE preceding the CBOT IPO, the ERPs were allowed to trade separately. The CBOE bought back 68 in a Dutch auction and retired those ERPs. Prior to yesterday’s announcement the most recent ERP sale was for $175,000, yesterday an ERP sold for $230,000 and the bid ask was $250,000 at $290,000.

As part of the agreement, ICE and CBOE also have agreed in principal to a broad commercial partnership where they will work jointly on technology, product development, and access to each exchange’s distribution.

The agreement puts pressure on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, whose enhanced offer to the CBOT, which was unanimously approved by the CBOT board of directors, was still lower than ICE’s offer as well as the market price of the CBOT.

Why take less?

With the CBOT board of directors deciding to endorse the revised CME offer despite it not only being below the ICE offer but also the market price of CBOT stock, perhaps it was only a matter of time before a lawsuit was filed over the whole process. The CBOT has often been bogged down by time consuming expensive lawsuits as it has attempted to transition it business over the last several years.

(more…)

Refco motions denied

Tuesday, May 15th, 2007

U.S. District Court Judge Gerard E. Lynch of the Southern District of New York recently made a decision on motions to dismiss various charges against several key people at the former Refco.Some of the denied motions were brought by Phillip Bennett and Tone Grant; nothing surprising there. But some names are closer to the futures side of the business: Joe Murphy, former EVP of global marketing, former CFTC general counsel, Dennis Klejna who came on board as Refco general counsel in 1999 and EVP and COO William Sexton. In the decision Judge Lynch denied motions to dismiss several counts against Klejna, Murphy and Sexton. One note the judge made in his lively 87-page opinion was despite the access by the three to specific documents that may have raised red flags to the problems at Refco, they may not have been suspicious enough to investigate: “In this case, there certainly was a monster under the bed; the question was whether anyone had a reason to look there.” Yet in the end, the judge still had reason to believe they were involved enough in the Refco day-to-day activities to deny their motions to dismiss certain charges.
Download file

Blast from the past

Thursday, May 10th, 2007

Klein & Co. Futures, Inc. has asked the Supreme Court of the United States to reinstate a Federal lawsuit against the New York Board of Trade (Nybot) and its subsidiaries. The lawsuit stemmed from a scandal involving the manipulation of settlement prices on options in the Pacific Stock Exchange Technology Index by Norman Eisler who at the time was chairman of the New York Futures Exchange (Nyfe), a subsidiary of Nybot, which led to huge losses by Klein and forcing it out of business.

The lawsuit charging Nybot with failing in bad faith to enforce rules that protect participants in futures markets from manipulation and fraud was dismissed by a federal court. A similar lawsuit by a group of traders on Nyfe was dismissed and a lawsuit by hedge fund manager Jim Moore was dropped after the Commodity Futures Trading Commission would not divulge information to the court according to Moore.

The CFTC found in a 2004 order that Eisler had manipulated option settlement prices in the index; it found in a 2001 order that the Nyfe and Nybot violated the Commodity Exchange Act by not following its own market oversight rules.

Klein is being supported by the Futures Industry Association (FIA), which has filed an Amicus brief in support of the petitioner. The FIA states in the brief that, “The second circuit clearly erred, and destabilized the Nation’s Futures Industry buy stripping Futures Commission Merchants of their statutory cause of action against registered entities.” (by Daniel P. Collins)